PDA

View Full Version : DOD Contract Goes to Known Money-Launderer


kim
06-06-2008, 05:16 PM
DOD Contract Goes to Known Money-Launderer
By: emptywheel Wednesday June 4, 2008 2:25 pm [digg]

Jeebus. First we confirm that the British defense company BAE was funneling bribe money into Soviet covert ops. And now we learn (h/t scribe) that DOD has a jet fuel contract with Gaith Pharaon.

Pharaon is best known for his central role in the BCCI scandal. As a seemingly wealthy Saudi, he served as a perfect front for BCCI, which wanted to purchase an American bank to make it easier to get money in and out of the US. So Pharaon schmoozed all the right people in Georgia (including a number of high level Democrats with ties to Jimmy Carter) and got BCCI its approval for the bank.

Well, now we're back in business with him, to the tune of $80 million.

The US military has awarded an $80 million contract to a prominent Saudi financier who has been indicted by the US Justice Department. The contract to supply jet fuel to American bases in Afghanistan was awarded to the Attock Refinery Ltd, a Pakistani-based refinery owned by Gaith Pharaon. Pharaon is wanted in connection with his alleged role at the failed Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), and the CenTrust savings and loan scandal, which cost US tax payers $1.7 billion.

The Saudi businessman was also named in a 2002 French parliamentary report as having links to informal money transfer networks called hawala, known to be used by traders and terrorists, including Al Qaeda.

Interestingly, Pharaon was also an investor in President George W. Bush's first business venture, Arbusto Energy.

[snip]

An official at Attock, who did not wish to be named, confirmed the refinery was supplying thousands of tons of jet fuel to the US base at Bagram Air Base every month.

- continued here:

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/06/04/dod-contract-goes-to-known-money-launderer/#comment-74631

kailin
06-06-2008, 06:52 PM
and ... only 8 hits to this thread

not a lot of interest in the truth -- but then, I guess 8 years of being conditioned by the boob toob has killed a LOT of brain cells, eh?

:1wall: thanks for posting -- take care of your head, tho!

Hepburn
06-06-2008, 06:59 PM
There is something seriously wrong with you Kailin.

krisinluck
06-06-2008, 08:26 PM
Just speaking for myself, but I rarely check out the blogosphere links. If I do, I do it only to find a news source and read the piece the commentary is on.

Kandi
06-06-2008, 09:13 PM
For me, I try and get news from the horse's mouth. I don't like the blog crap because most of it is conjecture/opinion. The news is all about sensational...I have tons of friends who are military, deployed or not. Getting the news straight from their mouths in many situations is the best thing. They're there...on the front...see a lot. Can't beat that. A guy who has been deployed three times in all this shit is going to tell you like it is.

mivona
06-07-2008, 02:08 AM
ABC reports it here: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4996285&page=1

Here's the spreadsheet from the DoD website showing that Supreme Fuels has been awarded the $80m contract, with the planned source from Attock: http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/Files/SP0600-08-R-0088%20Summary%20of%20Awards%20%282%29.pdf

Here's the 2007 dealings with Attock: http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/Files/Summary_Award_07-R-0088%28COR%29.pdf

The current administration is cravenly corrupt in who it deals with. They don't give a shit about public accountability, countering terrorism (unless there is money to be made from it - and promoting at lest some terrorism provides so many opportunities for further "security" profiteering).

kailin
06-07-2008, 05:51 AM
Thanks, Miv --

another thing that I wonder about, and should scare the .... out of anyone with relatives in the fighting forces, is ...

what's to stop these contractors from getting a bee in the bonnet over something or other and just spiking the oil in a couple of jets or helicopters or whatever?

Dang sure it ain't loyalty to the US of A or our fighting troops.

We're not even talking politics here -- just some little employee of these contractors somewhere getting annoyed one day for whatever reason --

iow -- isn't this a big risk to national security?

kim
06-07-2008, 07:22 AM
- firedoglake is full of a bunch of lawyers digging stuff up...

*

kim
06-07-2008, 08:03 AM
p.s. thanks mivona for the other link concerning this as well...

*