MEANWHILE, over on Ezboard.

[rossshow]

Seems that someone is telling little white lies about emails and things they were told:

http://p100.ezboard.com/fnukesplacefrm8.showMessageRange?topicID=56.topic&start=1&stop=20

LOL!



That's right - because the web host forced Ross to take it down.

...

close his account if he allows any more privacy violations, or if he bashes me or anyone associated with me, or if he reproduces any content from my board or allows any content from my board to be reproduced by anyone else.

...


have an email from the owner of the company that says so



Are you kidding? I'm fucking delighted



He defended the posting of my pics, calling it "fan art". Moron!



Polansky is a PUBLIC FIGURE!

He doesn't get it. Altered pics of him ARE PARODY! They are FAN ART!



That's why he has been placed in a straitjacket by his hosting company, and why I will eat his balls for breakfast every fucking day.



Eat my BALLS for BREAKFAST? Ick!

[rossshow]

Public figure:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0689797/

IMDB page.

[Heartland]

and why I will eat his balls for breakfast every fucking day. Ewwwwww, disgusting. Sounds like Alan's been watching too many gangster shows on TV. It just doesn't work for him, though. The Tony Soprano act just doesn't fit the face at all.

Got milk?

[agentorange]

Alan is more like Morty the wig salesman from Goodfellas.

[wasabanker]

Maybe milque? As in Casper Milquetoast?

[blissmeister]

That's right - because the web host forced Ross to take it down.
There's a sucker born every minute and the unactor*alan makes sure of that.

[Happy]

Chopsy, the naughty, nasty, whiny baby boy!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v104/Happy14/baby5.gif

[confusers]

Chopsy, the naughty, nasty, whiny baby boy!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v104/Happy14/baby5.gif


I love that .gif, Happy. :1drummer1:

[Happy]

Originally posted by confusers
I love that .gif, Happy.

Right click the gif and save it to your computer. :)

[rossshow]

Bump!

[blissmeister]

ouch~!

[rossshow]

I was in chat, at TCW, today.

Alan Polonsky still thniks that what he said at Nuke's Board is true!

http://www.therossshow.com/showpost.php?p=3144&postcount=1

[Cartman]

I'm confused!


Is this Parody or Fan Art?

(edited to make the image a link)

http://cartman.ikeras.com/files/hillary_carwash.jpg

(image may be considered offensive)


http://www.ikeras.com/forums1/images/smilies/cart2.gif

[rossshow]

Parody or Fan Art?

LOL! Now, well, it has public figures, AND a political figure. Could be Fan Art that's a Parody?

[Rawbunzel]

It's disgusting ,that's what it is.

[bluekazoo]

That is not art.

That's a cheapshot photoshop hack job, misogynistic in nature, and disgusting on many many levels.

I expect that shit from Cartman and the like .... but now even Ross thinks it's funny? I thought Ross respected women more than that.

I'm over here in the 'disgusted corner' with bunzy on this one.


:1madrealm

[toollady]

Cartman,

Grow the fuck up will ya?

You couldn't just post a link to the pic? How old are you, 12?

Here's your sign:

:1fuck1:

[rossshow]

It was funny because it's a chop job against Alan.

Funny because it USED to have a woman's face morphed in that I happen to like, now it has another woman I like, but one I do not know.

Other than that it's a puerile example of free speech.

[Toy Ranch]

But... you are going to get in trouble with your provider for having porn accessible to kids and such...

there are some serious new penalties for that.

[rossshow]

Frontal cartoon nudity is not nessesarily within the definition of porn.

[toollady]

Ross,

Are you going to let these fucktards ruin this board for you?

[rossshow]

No...

[toollady]

Well then, DO something Damnit!

Over in the corner with the blue one stomping my feet and holding my breath.

*hrumph*

[rossshow]

I am..

[sadie999]

It doesn't offend me any more than a shit joke offends me. It's low brow is all.

But if it could put this board at risk....

[rossshow]

It's low brow is all.

That is my feeling. It is also my feeling that it does NOT put this board at risk.

It is nasty, it is not porn.

[bluekazoo]

Thank you, Ross. I don't care what your reasons for changing it were, I'm glad you did it.

Good night.

[blissmeister]

How about some animation art of the unactor?


http://www.blissmeister.com/images/animations/slingshothead.gif

[rossshow]

How about some animation art of the unactor?

What about that clown picture...

[blissmeister]

What about that clown picture...Unfortunately, I was not the artist behind the clown picture. Hopefully if the artist is viewing here, s/he can post it.

[tekobari]

It was funny because it's a chop job against Alan.

Funny because it USED to have a woman's face morphed in that I happen to like, now it has another woman I like, but one I do not know.

Other than that it's a puerile example of free speech.Random thoughts:

It certainly is puerile. I don't see how it's a slap of any kind toward chops or nuke. It's a slap at Hillary Clinton, and an idiot's slap, at that. So I'm not sure why Cartman is so proud of this graphic. It's not just that it's not well done. It's that there are real issues, pro and con, against any of the people in the graphic. There are other, better ways of doing a "chop job".

Please tell me how it's a "chop job" against chops, anyway. I don't see it. In American's woman-hating sexual climate, it's actually quite the reverse.

If it's a matter of free speech, does that mean you won't ever edit anyone other than for illegal speech? If you won't, that I understand. If sometime down the road you do edit something out, this precedent will hang over it.

The whole thing bothers me, obviously. But those questions, imo, are still legitimate.

Random thoughts over.